NAGALRO RESPONSE TO CAFCASS CONTRACTS FEBRUARY 2002  

NAGALRO believes that the new choice of contracts offered by CAFCASS will be acceptable to many of our members.

Each member will need to evaluate carefully his or her own personal financial and professional arrangements before making an individual decision about either of the contracts.

It is vital that members’ decisions are returned to CAFCASS by 28 March 2002.

NAGALRO would wish to acknowledge the difference in tone of recent CAFCASS documents and the largely constructive dialogue, which took place during the recent consultations with CAFCASS. 

The NAGALRO consultation group appreciate the encouragement they continue to receive from colleagues.

At a meeting between the NAGALRO consultation group and the Acting Chief Executive of CAFCASS, Jonathan Tross, on 26 February 2002, it was agreed that regular meetings between NAGALRO and CAFCASS will take place to ensure ongoing communication, which will enhance professional practice.  The regular comments and views of members will assist in NAGALRO’s discussions.

As many members have observed, and we have raised with  CAFCASS already, there is a risk that the flat rate for both travel and professional time may skew practice because of its impact on the ability of Childrens Guardians to undertake work at a distance, such as Secure Accommodation, or where overnight stays are required.  For members, it will also mean a more rigid maintenance of expenditure on travel costs, which individuals can offset on their annual Inland Revenue returns.  NAGALRO plans to provide members with some accountancy guidance on how best to achieve this.

We would anticipate a review by CAFCASS after six months experience of the two contracts.  It will be essential for all practitioners to monitor the effect of these new contractual arrangements on practice.  The benefits of the costed case plans and the influence of the local manager on making child-centred decisions will need to be evaluated very closely. 

Guidance for the collection of monitoring data is essential for any effective review, and this will be made available by CAFCASS to all practitioners and managers, after further consultation to include NAGALRO and practitioners.  CAFCASS seeks the views of Guardians about its draft forms, which can be sent to Maureen Dillon at Newspaper House by 22 March 2002.

We hope it will now be fully recognised that this long struggle was not a contractual dispute, but a professionals’ response, which was essential to ensure the maintenance of a proven quality service for vulnerable children.

NAGALRO is satisfied that many of the fundamental principles it has proposed have been incorporated into CAFCASS’ current thinking, including the revised conflict of interest policy.

We hope that Guardians, solicitors, the Courts and CAFCASS can now begin a period of constructive consolidation of its basic aims, and the development of an enhanced service to children and families on which CAFCASS was originally predicated.

Susan Bindman
Carol Edwards
Eva Gregory
Michael Griffith Jones
Alison Paddle

27 02 01 

 

.